|LRL Legal Recovery|
|LRL Legal Recovery Law Offices San Diego, California THEY SUE YOU IN SUPERIOR COURT san diego, California |
|11th of Dec, 2010 by User519085 |
|THIS "LAW FIRM" FILED A SUIT AGAINST ME IN LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT, THINKING I WOULD NOT FILE A RESPONSE. DON'T IGNORE A LAWSUIT FROM THESE BOTTOM FEEDERS, PAY THE $205.00. OTHERWISE THEY WILL OBTAIN A DEFAULT JUDGEMENT AGAINST YOU. IF YOU ARE IN CALIFORNIA FILE WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE BAR. ALWAYS MAIL ALL COURT RELATED DOCUMENTS TO THESE BOTTOM FEEDERS VIA CERTIFIED MAIL WIH RETURN RECEIPT.|
THE OTHER COMPLAINT IS CORRECT. THEY HAVE A LOT OF TYING ERRORS IN THEIR COURT FORMS, THEY ARE BOILER PLATE.
THEY VIOLATE THE LAWS WITH REGARD TO DEBT COLLECTION. THEY SAY THEY NEVER RECEIVE PAPERS, THEY MISQUOTE THE LAW. I THINK THEY ARE SIMPLY A THIRD PARTY DEBT COLLECTOR, THEY CLAIM TO REPRESENT THE ORIGINAL CREDTIOR BUT THEY DON'T.
MY CHARGED OFF CREDIT CARD IS UNDER $1000.00 AND THEY ARE TRYING TO COLLECT NEARLY TRIPLE THAT AMOUNT.
|I recently received a notice of default from this law firm. I was never served with a complaint or summons. The court file states that the proof of service of summons has not been served. I called this law firm to let them know. They told me that someone from the court served me and since their from the court they couldn't be lying. They also told me that the case is already moving forward and the judge is siding with them. I am a paralegal and I know how to look up the information to see what is going on. I also talked to a clerk and she stated that this could not have transpired because they have not even had an opportunity to speak with the judge as there has not been a hearing yet. Something smells like fraud. First I have not been served. They are claiming they have served me. The court records indicate otherwise. Now they are lying about the status of the case. I am researching this company and the lawyer as of now. If anyone has any more information please share anything that you know. Thank you. I will be checking back regulary on this site.|
|I was served with a complaint in mid-April, 2011 with the law firm representing Capital One. Capital One via the law firm is suing me personally for a business debt that was closed out with a business chaper 7 bankruptcy filed in early 2010. Capital One never showed up the creditor's metting or contested the filing within the alloted time allowed by the Bankruptcy Court. I had sent a Cease and Desist letter to LRLO after I was first contacted by letter and telephone from one of their internal collectors that demanded that they not contact me until they provided copies any and all contracts, addendum's to the original contract, copies of all statements including copies of the original charges and that didn't stop them from contacting me repeatedly and lying to me. They never provided a copy of the original Credit Card Holders Agreement before the suit was filed and they didn't include a copy of the agreement with addendum's with the complaint to justify the alligations in the complaint. A Mark Walsh, the attorney of record has stated under penalty of perjury that if called upon he can and will testify to the facts in the case, yet he has no records to prove any of the case incolved me personally.|
I filed a Demurrer to Plaintiff's Complaint (in California this is asking the Court to reject the Complaint and dismiss the action). So we'll see what he has to say and what the Court has to say about the actions of the case.
Post your Comment