| April 28 2012 Jio Lucci Validates Malicious Web Posts With USA Law |
| USA Law Clearly Shows Slander From Rip Report: Jio Lucci Is Victim |
| 29th of Apr, 2012 by USA SECURITY |
JIO LUCCI: Victim::: SLANDERER USING DESPICABLE TACTICS To Harass: Security to crackdown
* security12909 iNTERNET, 28th of April 2012 3:00 Pm
* event date-time: Saturday, April 28 2012 12:00 PM
SECURITY: 223: Presented to a CA> Superior Ct Judge to View: DEFINITION: SLANDER 56 posts all TAGGED : by INTERNET SECURITY VICTIM: Jio Lucci (PERSON) definition: the one posting False written malice on the internet
(ID: PERSON) is in Violations of California and United States Sections Codes Person who is committing these malicious false posts was ordered to stop: Continues Person has violated acts of slander against: Jio Lucci and used the internet as a tool Both Civil and criminal penalties will be sought after : the (PERSON)
In the state of California slander (California Civil Code § 46) is rectified in civil court. The tort test for slander is a simple five-part examination that you apply to your own circumstances to determine of a case exists. This is the same test that a jury would apply in considering a civil judgment: If posts continue: criminal violations may apply
1) Is there evidence that the defendant made a false oral or spoken statement concerning the plaintiff? Yes Libel: written Posted on Internet 56 xs VICTIM: JIO LUCCI 4-28-2012
2) Is there evidence that the statement was defamatory, i.e., that it had the capability of harming the plaintiff's reputation if it were believed? YES: posted 56 malicious posts against Coach Jio Lucci VICTIM: Jio Lucci 4-28-2012
3) Is there evidence that the defendant communicated that statement to a person other than the plaintiff? YES: Used The INTERNET AS A TOOL plus paid a Company to ADDITIONAL post and paid them Victim: Jio Lucci 4-28-2012
4) Is there evidence that the defendant knew the defamatory statement was false, OR acted in reckless disregard as to whether the statement were false or not? ALL Malicious Defamatory statement: Per Section Code 46 Libel Slander Victim: Jio Lucci 4-28-2012
5) Is there evidence that the plaintiff suffered actual harm of a pecuniary nature, i.e., suffered a financial loss, as a result of the defamatory statement being made and believed by a third person, OR if there is no actual financial harm, does the slander take the form of either a) Statements imputing morally culpable criminal behavior . YES : The (person) is attempting to harm, mislead Coach Jio Lucci Clients, harm him in the industry: Victim: Jio Lucci 4-28-2012
ADDED: (PERSON) using Falsified WORDS (BEYOND THE REALM of Dispute , if any) Identity Theft: posted Jio Lucci personal information: (attached written slander) Thief Theft Con man P--- Filth More to be provided: Using "kids" as a tool to DETOUR THE PARENT.
PERSON now Identified as: SLANDERER evil and unlawful act: to harm the reputation of Jio Lucci
.......punitive damages/ revenue damages ______________________________
This Person who is maliciously harassing Jio Lucci on the Internet Posts was asked in a CIVIL MANNER to stop, remove. This was an attempt to give the person a chance for all written posts removed and disolved. In any DISPUTE ( IF ANY), no matter what the argument or situation is, THIS PERSON IS IN TOTAL VIOLATION OF CA Section CODE 46 : Libel Slander. In the event that the (PERSON) continues posts, it will be construded and prosecuted as criminal addition to civil.
Kent L Legal / Attorney w/ Security/ Internet GOOGGLE Assistance |
|
|
|
|
| Free Cams have to stop sending unwanted e-mails. |
|
|
Post your Comment
|
|
|
