| Jio Lucci/jio lucci FEB 11 2012 Person Post On Rip Report Trying To Scm Coach Lucci |
| Security of the internet will bring severe charges against the slanderer |
| 11th of Feb, 2012 by Security Watchdogg |
io Lucci/Coach Jio Lucci/jio lucci Feb 2 2012 Internet Security Helping
808939 802931 FALSE POSTS by Rip Report: orderedto stop.
Internet Security and search engines helping to remove posts
Read More: identity theft, thief, coach, security internet, reputation, googgle, libel slander, defamatory statement, internet posts, punitive damages
Feb 2 2012 Jio Lucci NEWSWIRE ALERT: Court Judge View malicious posts as :SLANDER
* security12909 iNTERNET, 2nd of Feb 2012
* event date-time: Feb 2 2012
The(person: referred to as) defined: Slanderer using very DEROGATORY TACTIC REMARKS TAGGED BY SECURITY: 60 Posts
SECURITY: 223: Presented to a CA> Superior Ct Judge to View: DEFINITION: SLANDER 56 posts all TAGGED : by INTERNET SECURITY VICTIM: Jio Lucci (PERSON) definition: the one posting False written malice on the internet
(ID: PERSON) is in Violations of California and United States Sections Codes Person who is committing these malicious false posts was ordered to stop: Continues Person has violated acts of slander against: Jio Lucci and used the internet as a tool Both Civil and criminal penalties will be sought after : the (PERSON)
In the state of California slander (California Civil Code § 46) is rectified in civil court. The tort test for slander is a simple five-part examination that you apply to your own circumstances to determine of a case exists. This is the same test that a jury would apply in considering a civil judgement: If posts continue: criminal violations may apply
1) Is there evidence that the defendant made a false oral or spoken statement concerning the plaintiff? Yes Libel: written Posted on Internet 56 xs VICTIM: JIO LUCCI 2-2-2012
2) Is there evidence that the statement was defamatory, i.e., that it had the capability of harming the plaintiff's reputation if it were believed? YES: posted 56 malicious posts against Coach Jio Lucci VICTIM: Jio Lucci 12-13-2011
3) Is there evidence that the defendant communicated that statement to a person other than the plaintiff? YES: Used The INTERNET AS A TOOL plus paid a Company to ADDITIONAL post and paid them Victim: JioLucci 12-13-2011
4) Is there evidence that the defendant knew the defamatory statement was false, OR acted in reckless disregard as to whether the statement were false or not? ALL Malicious Defamatory statement: Per Section Code 46 Libel Slander Victim: Jio Lucci 2-2-2012
5) Is there evidence that the plaintiff suffered actual harm of a pecuniary nature, i.e., suffered a financial loss, as a result of the defamatory statement being made and believed by a third person, OR if there is no actual financial harm, does the slander take the form of either a) Statements imputing morally culpable criminal behavior . YES : The (person) is attempting to harm, mislead Coach Jio Lucci Clients, harm him in the industry: Victim: Jio Lucci 2-2-2012 |
|
|
|
|
io Lucci/Coach Jio Lucci/jio lucci Feb 2 2012 Internet Security Helping
by baseballbaseballFebruary 2, 2012
Internet Security and search engines helping to remove posts
Read More: identity theft, thief, coach, security internet, reputation, googgle, libel slander, defamatory statement, internet posts, punitive damages
Feb 2 2012 Jio Lucci NEWSWIRE ALERT: Court Judge View malicious posts as :SLANDER
* security12909 iNTERNET, 2nd of Feb 2012
* event date-time: Feb 2 2012
The(person: referred to as) defined: Slanderer using very DEROGATORY TACTIC REMARKS TAGGED BY SECURITY: 60 Posts
SECURITY: 223: Presented to a CA> Superior Ct Judge to View: DEFINITION: SLANDER 56 posts all TAGGED : by INTERNET SECURITY VICTIM: Jio Lucci (PERSON) definition: the one posting False written malice on the internet
(ID: PERSON) is in Violations of California and United States Sections Codes Person who is committing these malicious false posts was ordered to stop: Continues Person has violated acts of slander against: Jio Lucci and used the internet as a tool Both Civil and criminal penalties will be sought after : the (PERSON)
In the state of California slander (California Civil Code § 46) is rectified in civil court. The tort test for slander is a simple five-part examination that you apply to your own circumstances to determine of a case exists. This is the same test that a jury would apply in considering a civil judgement: If posts continue: criminal violations may apply
1) Is there evidence that the defendant made a false oral or spoken statement concerning the plaintiff? Yes Libel: written Posted on Internet 56 xs VICTIM: JIO LUCCI 2-2-2012
2) Is there evidence that the statement was defamatory, i.e., that it had the capability of harming the plaintiff's reputation if it were believed? YES: posted 56 malicious posts against Coach Jio Lucci VICTIM: Jio Lucci 12-13-2011
3) Is there evidence that the defendant communicated that statement to a person other than the plaintiff? YES: Used The INTERNET AS A TOOL plus paid a Company to ADDITIONAL post and paid them Victim: JioLucci 12-13-2011
4) Is there evidence that the defendant knew the defamatory statement was false, OR acted in reckless disregard as to whether the statement were false or not? ALL Malicious Defamatory statement: Per Section Code 46 Libel Slander Victim: Jio Lucci 2-2-2012
5) Is there evidence that the plaintiff suffered actual harm of a pecuniary nature, i.e., suffered a financial loss, as a result of the defamatory statement being made and believed by a third person, OR if there is no actual financial harm, does the slander take the form of either a) Statements imputing morally culpable criminal behavior . YES : The (person) is attempting to harm, mislead Coach Jio Lucci Clients, harm him in the industry: Victim: Jio Lucci 2-2-2012 |
|
|
|
io Lucci/Coach Jio Lucci/jio lucci Feb 2 2012 Internet Security Helping
by baseballbaseballFebruary 2, 2012
Internet Security and search engines helping to remove posts
Read More: identity theft, thief, coach, security internet, reputation, googgle, libel slander, defamatory statement, internet posts, punitive damages
Feb 2 2012 Jio Lucci NEWSWIRE ALERT: Court Judge View malicious posts as :SLANDER
* security12909 iNTERNET, 2nd of Feb 2012
* event date-time: Feb 2 2012
The(person: referred to as) defined: Slanderer using very DEROGATORY TACTIC REMARKS TAGGED BY SECURITY: 60 Posts
SECURITY: 223: Presented to a CA> Superior Ct Judge to View: DEFINITION: SLANDER 56 posts all TAGGED : by INTERNET SECURITY VICTIM: Jio Lucci (PERSON) definition: the one posting False written malice on the internet
(ID: PERSON) is in Violations of California and United States Sections Codes Person who is committing these malicious false posts was ordered to stop: Continues Person has violated acts of slander against: Jio Lucci and used the internet as a tool Both Civil and criminal penalties will be sought after : the (PERSON)
In the state of California slander (California Civil Code § 46) is rectified in civil court. The tort test for slander is a simple five-part examination that you apply to your own circumstances to determine of a case exists. This is the same test that a jury would apply in considering a civil judgement: If posts continue: criminal violations may apply
1) Is there evidence that the defendant made a false oral or spoken statement concerning the plaintiff? Yes Libel: written Posted on Internet 56 xs VICTIM: JIO LUCCI 2-2-2012
2) Is there evidence that the statement was defamatory, i.e., that it had the capability of harming the plaintiff's reputation if it were believed? YES: posted 56 malicious posts against Coach Jio Lucci VICTIM: Jio Lucci 12-13-2011
3) Is there evidence that the defendant communicated that statement to a person other than the plaintiff? YES: Used The INTERNET AS A TOOL plus paid a Company to ADDITIONAL post and paid them Victim: JioLucci 12-13-2011
4) Is there evidence that the defendant knew the defamatory statement was false, OR acted in reckless disregard as to whether the statement were false or not? ALL Malicious Defamatory statement: Per Section Code 46 Libel Slander Victim: Jio Lucci 2-2-2012
5) Is there evidence that the plaintiff suffered actual harm of a pecuniary nature, i.e., suffered a financial loss, as a result of the defamatory statement being made and believed by a third person, OR if there is no actual financial harm, does the slander take the form of either a) Statements imputing morally culpable criminal behavior . YES : The (person) is attempting to harm, mislead Coach Jio Lucci Clients, harm him in the industry: Victim: Jio Lucci 2-2-2012 |
|
|
|
io Lucci/Coach Jio Lucci/jio lucci Feb 2 2012 Internet Security Helping
by baseballbaseballFebruary 2, 2012
Internet Security and search engines helping to remove posts
Read More: identity theft, thief, coach, security internet, reputation, googgle, libel slander, defamatory statement, internet posts, punitive damages
Feb 2 2012 Jio Lucci NEWSWIRE ALERT: Court Judge View malicious posts as :SLANDER
* security12909 iNTERNET, 2nd of Feb 2012
* event date-time: Feb 2 2012
The(person: referred to as) defined: Slanderer using very DEROGATORY TACTIC REMARKS TAGGED BY SECURITY: 60 Posts
SECURITY: 223: Presented to a CA> Superior Ct Judge to View: DEFINITION: SLANDER 56 posts all TAGGED : by INTERNET SECURITY VICTIM: Jio Lucci (PERSON) definition: the one posting False written malice on the internet
(ID: PERSON) is in Violations of California and United States Sections Codes Person who is committing these malicious false posts was ordered to stop: Continues Person has violated acts of slander against: Jio Lucci and used the internet as a tool Both Civil and criminal penalties will be sought after : the (PERSON)
In the state of California slander (California Civil Code § 46) is rectified in civil court. The tort test for slander is a simple five-part examination that you apply to your own circumstances to determine of a case exists. This is the same test that a jury would apply in considering a civil judgement: If posts continue: criminal violations may apply
1) Is there evidence that the defendant made a false oral or spoken statement concerning the plaintiff? Yes Libel: written Posted on Internet 56 xs VICTIM: JIO LUCCI 2-2-2012
2) Is there evidence that the statement was defamatory, i.e., that it had the capability of harming the plaintiff's reputation if it were believed? YES: posted 56 malicious posts against Coach Jio Lucci VICTIM: Jio Lucci 12-13-2011
3) Is there evidence that the defendant communicated that statement to a person other than the plaintiff? YES: Used The INTERNET AS A TOOL plus paid a Company to ADDITIONAL post and paid them Victim: JioLucci 12-13-2011
4) Is there evidence that the defendant knew the defamatory statement was false, OR acted in reckless disregard as to whether the statement were false or not? ALL Malicious Defamatory statement: Per Section Code 46 Libel Slander Victim: Jio Lucci 2-2-2012
5) Is there evidence that the plaintiff suffered actual harm of a pecuniary nature, i.e., suffered a financial loss, as a result of the defamatory statement being made and believed by a third person, OR if there is no actual financial harm, does the slander take the form of either a) Statements imputing morally culpable criminal behavior . YES : The (person) is attempting to harm, mislead Coach Jio Lucci Clients, harm him in the industry: Victim: Jio Lucci 2-2-2012 |
|
|
Post your Comment
|
|
|
